|
|
For answers to many questions, consult the CURRENT MONTHLY REVISED EDITION of the Official Traditional Catholic Directory, Listing All Traditional Latin Masses and Traditional Resources for North America. For further information, click on the TRADITIO Network's Official Traditional Catholic Directory department, provided to the TRADITIO Network by the National Registry of Traditional Latin Masses. |
If you have you have personally benefited from the services of the TRADITIO Network, please support the continuation of the TRADITIO Network's Apostolate by clicking on the box to the left to made a donation easily, securely, and confidentially by bank account or credit card through PayPal. Regular contributors become Benefactors of the TRADITIO Network, and their intentions are specially commemorated at Traditional Latin Masses offered. Using PayPal reduces our administrative burden considerably, but if need to use a paper check, click on FAQ01: "How Can I Help the TRADITIO Network's Apostolate?" |
Subscribe to the Free TRADITIO
RSS Feed
When independent traditional Catholic bishop Richard Williamson, formerly the senior bishop of the Society of St. Pius X, consecrated Fr. Jean-Michel Faure, the latest new bishop for the traditional Catholic movement on the Feast of St. Joseph, March 19, 2015, Bernie Fellay, the Superior-Dictator of the Neo-SSPX, condemned the consecration on the same day. But Fellay switched his story. Previously, he had contended that he had expelled Bishop Williamson from his Neo-SSPX, which had abandoned the founding principles of traditional Catholic founder-archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, purportedly because Williamson had been "disobedient."
But on March 19, 2015, Fellay did a volte-face from his previous allegation that Williamson had been excluded from the Neo-SSPX because of "disobedience." Now, to the contrary, Fellay has admitted that the real reason for Williamson's exclusion was his "vigorous criticism" of Fellay's attempts to sell out to the New Order sect, led at that time by the Second Paedophile Newpope, Benedict-Ratzinger. Fellay admitted, now for the first time, that he is being accused by his own members of "betraying Archbishop Lefebvre's work."
Fellay's betrayal was confirmed by Newrome, when on March 20, 2015, Newarchbship Guido Pozzo, Secretary of the subcommission "Ecclesia Dei," that Fellay had participated in meetings with the New Order sect, with more to come. At the same time Fellay is lying to his members, implying that he had learned his lesson from the 2012 fiasco with Ratzinger and had cut off his dealings with Newrome.
Of even more significance is that, contrary to the false reports in the press, Francis-Bergoglio did not have the guts to Novus Ordo "excommunicate" Bishop Williamson. Bergoglio issued no document to this effect. Some reports indicated that Williamson, by the act of consecrating a bishop in spite of Bergoglio, was "automatically" (latae sententiae) excommunicated. But that report was false because even Newchurch's Modernist New Code of Canon Law, issued in 1983, exonerates Williamson's action because he "acted out of necessity" for the Faith and the Church.
True Catholics, as we have continuously stated, Fellay is an outright liar, a fabricator and manipulator of the worst degree. For over twenty years now, he has been merciless in engineering the sell out of his founder and consecrator, Archbishop Levebvre's originally-traditional Society of St. Pius X to the anti-Catholic Newchurch of the New Order in Newrome. Now Fellay is beginning to imply that his tenure, like that of his leader, the Third Paedophile Newpope, Francis-Bergoglio, may be cut short.
Francis-Bergoglio's Newvatican has dealt Bernie Fellay, Superior-Dictator, a stunning blow to his continued efforts to sell out Archbishop Lefebvre's once-traditional Society of St. Pius X to the New Order sect and its officials, whom the Archbishop condemned in the strongest terms as "not Catholic." On March 20, 2015, Guido Pozzo, the Secretary of Bergoglio's "Ecclesia Dei" Commission, now demoted to a subcommission, established to prattle with Newchurch pseudo-traditionalists, answered questions for the Rome's press agency I.Media in response to independent traditional Catholic bishop Richard Williamson's consecration on March 19, 2015, of another bishop for the traditional Catholic movement, Jean-Michel Faure.
Pozzo said that the fault lies entirely with Fellay's Neo-SSPX, pointing to the fact that there are "problems within the Society ... beyond the doctrinal difficulties that exist." Pozzo went on to state that Fellay had lost a consensus internally within his Neo-SSPX. Pozzo was, of course, referring that Fellay's Neo-SSPX is falling apart. It has lost one of its four bishops, with rumors that a second is planning to abandon him. One of six priests has abandoned him because of his attempts to sell out to the anti-Catholic Newchurch of the New Order.
Pozzo also indicated that Francis-Bergoglio is not going to lift a finger toward Fellay and his Neo-SSPX. Instead, Bergoglio is requiring that Fellay unconditionally "decide to enter" the New Order sect.
True Catholics, ever since the death of Archbishop Lefebvre in 1991, Fellay has been trying to sell out to the New Order sect. Here it is, almost 25 years later, and all that hehas occurred is a giant step backward -- from the perspective of that fraction of Fellay's Neo-SSPX that wants to sell out with him. The SSPX and the Church itself would be in a much different state today if, instead of wasting 25 years of time and money almost exclusively to become sellouts to the New Order, Fellay and his Neo-SSPX had expended the same time and money implementing the Archbishop's policy of having nothing to do with what he called unCatholic "Modernist Rome." Fellay's own clergy and membership, however, are now getting the picture. Large numbers of them are abandoning Fellay and his Modernist policies and his scheme to sell out to the New Order sect.
As international outrage grows against Francis-Bergoglio for his appointment of a paedophile Newbishop, members of the Newpope's own Commission on Child Sexual Abuse has slammed Bergoglio for appointing Juan Barros Madrid as Newbishop of Osorno, Chile, who was denounced in court by three child victims as a voyeur in the room while Chile's most notorious paedophile presbyter, Madrid's "intimate" friend, sodomized them. Madrid then tried to cover up the sex crimes in an elaborate fraud involving the Newarchbishop Primate of Chile.
Francis-Bergoglio could hardly claim ignorance that he appointed a paedophile as a Newbishop. Newvatican itself prosecuted Madrid's "intimate" friend for sex crimes against children and then hid him away in a monastery. Moreover, the three victims notified Bergoglio of his Newbishop appointee's active complicity in sex crimes, and most of the Newdiocese's presbyters and half of the Chilean parliament demanded that Bergoglio withdraw the appointment.
Bergoglio, however, refused to admit that he had made a grave error in appointing a known paedophile accomplice. Bergoglio refused to withdraw the appointment. He refused even to suspend the appointment. Instead, he went full bore in forcing the installation of Madrid on March 21, 2015. He even went so far as to express "full confidence and support" in his paedophile appointee.
But the Chilean Newchurchers and people courageously stood up to the hypocrite Francis "Mr. Zero Tolerance" Bergoglio. Four thousand of them rioted in the Newcathedral, and Newbishop Madrid barely escaped with his life. The Chileans prevented a "Mess of Installation" from being performed and prevented Newbishop Madrid from delivering a "homily." The irony of all this is that the only sitting Newbishop whom Bergoglio has fired was one whose "crime" was perhaps spending a little too much money on building a Newdiocesan administration center and convent for his Newdiocese. Clearly, for Bergoglio, sex crimes against children does not rise to the level of firing!
A victim of Newchurch clergy's sex crimes against children who serves on Bergoglio's Commission said that Bergoglio's forcing the installation of the sex criminal as Newbishop in Chile "goes completely against what [Bergoglio] has said in the past about those who protect abusers." [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Associated Press.]
True Catholics, the jig is close to being up for Francis-Bergoglio. Even his own people are now calling him a liar and a hypocrite -- one that preys upon children. Christ Himself prescribed the penalty for such as Bergoglio: "a millstone should be hanged about his neck, and ... he should be drowned in the depth of the sea" (Matthew 18:6/DRV). The unrepentant Bergoglio can play propaganda games all he wants in this life, but when shortly he faces The Judgment -- and he himself indicates that that will be soon -- the Divine millstone is ready drag him down to the very pit of Hell.
Benedict-Ratzinger's long-time intimate, Newarchbishop George Ganswein, told the Italian periodical Oggi on March 17, 2015, that Ex-Newpope Benedict-Ratzinger's "theological work" is now kaput. Traditional Catholics will receive this news with joy, because the Modernist Ratzinger's last work, the Jesus trilogy, caused nothing but controversy and scandal. Ratzinger was the first Newpope to break the invariable tradition that a pope (if that is what a Newpope is) should not write books because their authority is confused as to whether they constitute papal opinion or personal opinion.
Ganswein swings both ways, serving as personal secretary to Ratzinger at the same time he serves as Prefect of the Newpontifical Household for Francis-Bergoglio. Ganswein's statement contradicted what Ratzinger had announced at the beginning of 2014, that he would write more books. Instead, Ganswein revealed that Ratzinger is no longer physically competent to write. On the advice of his doctor, Ratzinger uses a walker outside his retirement place and a walking stick inside.
Like a good Modernist, Ratzinger, who was never consecrated as a bishop in the valid Sacrament of Holy Orders, but merely "installed" as a New Order doppelganger under the invalid Protestantized New Ordinal of 1968, daily simulates the invalid full-blown New Order Mess of 1969 -- not even his own half New Order Mess of 1962+, erroneously known as "Extraordinary." Moreover, he con-celebrates the invalid Mess, which contradicts the traditional theology of the Mass. Newchurch pseudo-traditionalists seem to think that Ratzinger is traditional. He is not. He was a condemned Modernist leader at the Vatican II Council and remains a committed Modernist to this day.
Ganswein revealed that members of the Newcuria "didn't welcome the presence of the ex-pope in the [New]vatican." Ganswein went on essentially to admit that the cause of Ratzinger abdication on February 28, 2015, was the Vatileaks scandal, in which Ratzinger's long-time butler and personal friend was so outraged by Ratzinger's corruption that he turned over hundreds of pages of Ratzinger's corruption-filled confidential official documents to the Italian press.
True Catholics, Benedict-Ratzinger to this day remains blind to the morass of sin and corruption into which he plunged himself and his Newchurch. Ratzinger compares his butler's action to the Apostles who betrayed Christ, but he doesn't see that it is he himself, the supposed successor to St. Peter, not his butler, who betrayed Christ by associating himself to the heresy of Modernism and perpetrating financial and moral corruption to a degree that had not been seen in the Church for four centuries. Far from a Catholic, Ratzinger for the first time in history declared an invalid, Protestantized form of the Mess, the New Order Mess of 1969, fabricated by the Freemason presbyter Hannibal Bugnini after Vatican II, as the "Ordinary Mess" of the Newchurch of the New Order.
Francis-Bergoglio's popularity has taken a plunge since his appointment of a paedophile to be the Newbishop of Osorno, Chile. Juan Barros Madrid watched as a voyeur when Chile's most notorious paedophile presbyter, Fernando Karadima Farina, sodomized children. Newchurch presbyters in Osorno, as well as half the Chilean Parliament pleaded with Bergoglio to withdraw the appointment, but the man who claimed to be "Mr. Zero Tolerance" turned a deaf ear to his outraged Newchurchers. Bergoglio is now being widely characterized in the international press as a liar and paedophile supporter.
But like the equally notorious Newcardinal Bernard Law, of Boston, Massachusetts, who was the first Newbishop publicly implicated in Newchurch's Great Sex and Embezzlement Holocaust, whom the "Unsaint" JPII-Wojtyla would not punish, the corrupt Newpopes suffer the outrage of their people. Within a week after Wojtyla refused to take action against Law, a mere one hundred Boston Newchurchers demonstrated against him and forced his resignation.
Now the Chilean Newchurchers have taken opposition to a Newpope, in this case, Francis-Bergoglio, one step further. Four thousand rioted at the Novus Ordo "installation" on March 21, 2015, of Bergoglio's paedophile appointee as Newbishop, Juan Barros Madrid. outside of St. Matthew's Newcathedral at Osorno, turning the area into a "battlefield," according to local press reports. They dressed in the black of mourning, pelted Madrid with trash, shoved him, and tried to block his entrance. They physically attacked Bergoglio's appointee as he tried to make his way into St. Matthew's Newcathedral to be "installed."
When police had to be called to get Barros into the Newcathedral, the rioting continued inside the Newcathedral, with Newchurchers continuing to scream: "Get out, you paedopile!" Barros had barely been "installed" at the order of Francis "Friend of Paedophiles" Bergoglio before the Newchurchers climbed onto the Novus Ordo dinner table, at which point the phony service had to be cancelled before the "homily," and Barros ran for his life out a side door. Thank God, the invalid and blasphemous Novus Ordo Mess did not occur. Of course Barros is no bishop. He was not consecrated as a bishop in the valid, traditional Sacrament of Holy Orders, but was merely installed as a Newbishop under the invalid, Protestantized New Ordinal of 1968.
The Osorno Newchurchers and the Chilean parliamentarians are continuing to demand that Bergoglio fire Madrid. If he doesn't, they, and others, may be calling for Bergoglio's own abdication as a patent paedophiliac. Press around the world are now reporting that Francis-Bergoglio's "zero tolerance" policy toward his paedophile Newclergy is merely an elaborate propaganda ruse.
Three of presbyter Farina's and "bishop" Madrid's child victims have sworn in court that Karadima sodomized them while Madrid watched and that Madrid afterward conducted a full-scale cover-up of the crimes. Even Newvatican found Madrids's prebyter "intimate" in 2011. But that didn't stop Francis "Mr. Fraud" Bergoglio from appointing Barros and refusing to withdraw the appointment. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Euronews.]
True Catholics, God bless the courageous Chileans who stood up to Francis-Bergoglio and his paedophile appointee. If more Newchurchers had so acted earlier, when the anti-Catholic Newchurch of the New Order was substituting itself for the Catholic Church, Catholics might today still be worshipping at the valid Traditional Latin Mass, receiving valid traditional Sacrament, and receiving education in Catholic doctrine and morality.
As human beings, we need to make use of material things to help us direct our whole being, soul and body, towards God. Beautiful statues, pictures, music, incense, books, Liturgy, Scripture, the example of others -- the list goes on. Playing Gregorian chant in your home is an excellent way to help set a recollected and prayerful mood, for example, playing Gregorian chant every Sunday morning as us get ready for Mass, and the especially beautiful chant for Holy Week and Easter.
The TRADITIO Fathers acknowledge the contributions of the St. John Schola as an international leader in the practice of the Sacred Chant, providing to traditional Catholics live recordings of the type of chant pieces that they might hear in their own traditional church or chapel rendered by a small lay choir. The St. John Schola, an independent organization separate from the TRADITIO Network, for many years has provided as a courtesy to our readers information, resources, and recordings of the Sacred Chant that has been the proper music of the Roman Catholic Church for 2,000 years.
Holy Week and Easter (Volume 9).
This CD includes significant excerpts from the Rites of Palm Sunday, the Sacred Triduum, and Easter. It includes the Procession of the Palms to the tolling of the carillon and the Gloria Laus, alternating inside and outside at the closed door of the church; the polyphonic Popule Meus for Good Friday by Vittoria, sung a duetto by the cantors; the Pro-Vespers from the Easter Vigil Mass on Holy Saturday morning; the Kyrie Eleison, troped by the cantor in the mediaeval style; the special Paschal Gradual Haec Dies, sung by the cantors; the Easter Sequence Victimae Paschali Laudes; and the Paschal Ite, Missa Est with distinctive doubled Alleluia.
For ordering and descriptive information, click on the TRADITIO Network's Gregorian Chant department.
For the first time since 1927, a Cardinal (in this case, a New Order Newcardinal) has resigned on March 20, 2015, from the rights and privileges of his office. Keith O'Brien, Newcardinal Primate of Scotland, was public exposed as sodomizing his seminarians and presbyters. Bergoglio allowed O'Brien to resign without conducting a public investigation of his crimes and openly reporting these to his Newchurchers. After all, Francis "Mr. Transparency" Begoglio claimed that his regime was going to be the most "open and transparent." Instead, Bergoglio has been exposed again as "Mr. Cover-up."
In February 2013 O'Brien was allowed to "retire" after he admitted sodomizing seminarians and priests under the color of his Newchurch "authority," after he had gotten them liquored up. Bergoglio, instead of subjecting O'Brien to a Newvatican court, let him off with a resignation -- a typical method by which Newpopes JPII-Wojtyla, Benedict-Ratzinger, and Francis-Bergoglio have covered up the facts about crimes perpetrated by Newchurch leaders. The Survivors Network against Those Abused by Presbyters (SNAP) denounced Bergoglio as a "cover-up" artist in a release stating: "As it has done with dozens of abusive prelates, the [New]vatican is disclosing nothing about O'Brien's wrongdoing. There's no transparency here. Not one Catholic [Sic] official has disclosed anything of substance about O'Brien's misdeeds. And what of his clerical colleagues? Not one of them knew of or suspected that O'Brien was abusing others?"
The last time a Cardinal resigned his office was in 1927, when the Jesuit cleric Louis Billot resigned in anger over Pope Pius XI’s condemnation of the Fascist political movement, Action Francaise. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Agence France-Presse.]
True Catholics, the hypocritical Francis-Bergoglio has allowed the sodomite O'Brien to remain a presbyter and to keep the formal title of "cardinal," but he will not be allowed to attend any future conclave. Meanwhile, Bergoglio has paid for a house in northern England for O'Brien to live in. Francis "Mr. Transparency" Bergoglio has operated in total secrecy in l'affaire O'Brien, with Newpope showing himself as a public hypocrite and liar. But that is nothing new for Bergoglio.
We TRADITIO Fathers have pointed out on several occasion that Newchurch's Great Sex & Embezzlement Holocaust goes on unabated. Most recently, Francis-Bergoglio himself has been implicated by appointing the "intimate" associate of a notorious paedophile presbyter to become the Newbishop of Osorno, Chile. Newchurch in Chile and even the Chilean Parliament have demanded that Bergoglio withdraw the nomination, but he has not done so in over two months.
Many of Newchurch's sexual predations against children have been against altar boys. Now we find that Newchurch has been expanding its sexual predations against children into a new area, unique to the New Order sect: altar girls. U.S. immigration authorities report arresting on March 20, 2015, a Newchurch presbyter, Hector Coria Gonzales, in Davis, California. In Superior Court Gonzales confessed to raping the altar girl. Authorities are preparing to deport Gonzales, now in jail, back to Mexico.
It was Jaime Soto, bishop of the Newchurch diocese of Sacramento, California, who legally admitted Gonzales into his Newdiocese from Mexico, where the criminal paedophile presbyter could rape children at St. James's Newparish in Davis. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Associated Press.]
True Catholics, the criminal saga of Francis-Bergoglio and his Newchurch of the New Order continues in full flower. Bergoglio has been pulling the wool over the eyes of his clueless Newchurch by propagandizing himself as "Mr. Zero Tolerance," while in fact he has been appointing paedophile Newbishops and running his New Order sect as a paedophile front organization. Bergoglio is a disgusting fraud, liar, and criminal, who should suffer the ancient penalty for corrupt popes: being tossed into Rome's Tiber River!
You know that things have gotten really bad when even the putative U.S. President is ignorant of Western history. At the February 5, 2015, National Prayer Breakfast in Washington, D.C., Barack Obama demonstrated his ignorance when he characterized Christianity as a violent religion, supposedly because of the Holy Crusades, of whose history he also seems abysmally ignorant. Obama neglected to mention that Christianity couldn't hold a candle with respect to the violence of his favored Mohammedanism (one-third of Americans believe Obama to be a closet Mohammedan), which prides itself on engaging in mass murder, systematic rape, slavery, beheading innocents, bombing public events, shooting up school children, and wiping out whole religious communities.
Obama's ignorance about the Holy Crusades of Christianity is shared even by many who call themselves Christians, so let us address here the facts. As they say, "a picture speaks a thousand words," so let us start with the map above. September 11, 2001, was certainly not the only time that the Mohammedan (Islamic) "axis of evil" has attacked the West. The Mohammedans have attempted imperialistic and militaristic invasions of the West in at least three major campaigns over a millennium.
The role of the Catholic Church in the Holy Crusades was quite different from the imperialist designs of the Mohammedans. The Church fought to maintain the right of Christians to safe pilgrimage to the Holy Land, which had been blocked by new Mohammedan rulers of the area. Moreover, the Crusaders were attempting to free Christians who had been enslaved by the Mohammedans. (You would think that Obama, as a Negro who constantly refers to the injustice of slavery in the United States before the Civil War, should be sympathetic to freeing the White slaves of the Mohammedans -- but no.)
The Holy Crusades were inspired by the supreme indignation Christians felt at the Mohammedans' desecration of the Holy Sepulchre and other sacred sites of the Holy Land. Pope Blessed Urban II called for the First Crusade (1095-1101), describing the outrages suffered by Christians at the hands of the militant Mohammedans:
They [the Mohammedan Turks] have invaded the lands of those Christians and have depopulated them by the sword, pillage, and fire; they have led away a part of the captives into their own country, and a part they have destroyed by cruel tortures.... When they wish to torture people by a base death, they perforate their navels, and dragging forth the extremity of the intestines, bind them to a stake; then with flogging they lead the victim around until, the viscera having gushed forth, the victim falls prostrate upon the ground. Others they bind to a post and pierce with arrows. Others they compel to extend their necks and then, attacking them with naked swords, attempt to cut through the neck with a single blow. What shall I say of the abominable rape of the women? To speak of it is worse than to be silent.St. Bernard of Clairvaux preached the Second Crusade (1133-1137). St. Francis of Assisi personally accompanied the Fifth Crusade (1217-1219), inaugurated by Pope Innocent III, and attempted to convert the Mohammedan leader Sultan Malek-el-Kamil, saying, "We have come to preach faith in Jesus Christ to you, that you will renounce Mohammed, that wicked slave of the Devil, and obtain everlasting life."
The Holy Crusades were an act of piety and love of God and neighbor. But they were also a means by which the Catholic Church and its people defended Western Civilization, its culture, its religion, and its way of life. Many consecrated Catholic Knights gave up riches and comforts at home for danger and death in the deserts of Arabia. The fact that the Holy Land had been invaded by the Mohammedans and that Christian pilgrims, who had been going to the Holy Land peacefully for generations, were then being robbed and slaughtered receives no attention. Even Christians too often forget that had it not been for the Holy Crusades, there is a high probability that the West would be a patchwork of Mohammedanism instead of the center of Christianity.
For further information, click on FAQ10: How Do You Explain These Traditional Catholic Beliefs? in the section "Crusades."
Independent traditional Catholic bishop Richard Williamson and traditional Catholic bishop designate Jean-Michel Faure on March 18, 2015, separately explained why they were proceeding with the consecration of another traditional bishop for the worldwide traditional Catholic movement.
Williamson was formerly the senior bishop in Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre's original traditional Catholic Society of St. Pius X (SSPX). He left Fellay's repurposed Neo-SSPX in 2012, when Fellay was working to sell out his Neo-SSPX to the unCatholic New Order sect. Fr. Faure, who was ordained a priest by Archbishop Lefebvre in 1977, also opposed Fellay's attempted sellout and left the Neo-SSPX in 2013.
In his statement Fr. Faure stated that he was willing to be consecrated a bishop despite the fuming of the New Order sect about his consecration because "we cannot leave The Resistance without bishops." He went on: "As Archbishop Lefebvre said, Catholic bishops are indispensable for the conservation of the true doctrine of the Faith and the Sacraments." Faure is Coordinator of the St. Marcel Initiative, founded by Bishop Williamson as "a loose network of independent pockets of Catholic Resistance."
In his statement Bishop Williamson referred to Francis-Bergoglio and his New Order sectarians as "modernist cuckoos" and traditional Catholics as "nightingales," stating: "Wherever the remainder of the true nightingales are visibly gathered, in whatever makeshift nest, they are in the Church, they are the true visible Church, and their beautiful song testifies to anyone who has ears to hear that the cuckoos are nothing but cuckoos who have stolen the Catholic nest which they presently occupy." Williamson went on to criticize the Neo-SSPX's Superior-Dictator Bernie Fellay and his henchmen for being "tone deaf" and unable "to distinguish the song of cuckoos from that of nightingales."
Bishop Williamson said that he is unconcerned about the fuming of the New Order sect about the consecration because "what we intend with this consecration is to preserve the true Catholic Faith from the greatest crisis that the Church has suffered in her history."
Meanwhile, news of the consecration was spreading in Newrome. A moral theologian at Francis-Bergoglio's Pontifical Holy Cross University in Rome indicated that Newrome was afraid that, like Archbishop Lefebvre's consecrations of 1988, Bishop Williamson's consecration of Faure as a new bishop for the traditional Catholic movement will further undermine Bergoglio's New Order sect by adding another traditional Catholic bishop to ordain even more traditional priests outside the New Order sect and Bernie Fellay's New Order-leaning Neo-SSPX. Moreover, Williamson's consecration now galvanizes traditional Catholics who do not believe that Bergoglio's New Order sect is the real Catholic Church or that Francis-Bergoglio is a real Catholic pope. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Catholic News Service.]
The TRADITIO Network has been advised by the Monastery of the Holy Cross of Novo Friburgo, Brazil, under the aegis of the Unio Sacerdotalis Marcellus Lefebvre, commonly known as "The Resistance," has announced that at this monastery Bishop Richard Williamson, the former senior bishop of the Society of St. Pius X (SSPX), who separated himself from Bernie Fellay, the Neo-SSPX Superior-Dictator that wanted to attach the NSSPX to the Newchurch of the New Order, will consecrate Fr. Jean-Michel Faure on the Feast of St. Joseph, March 19, 2015, as the newest bishop for the traditional Catholic movement. Fr. Faure reportedly will be consecrated in the episcopal vestments of the Pope St. Pius X. The announcement occurred only two days before the event so as to obviate any possibility of interference.
In September 2013 the TRADITIO Network reported that for The Resistance, the worldwide movement of priests and laity abandoning Bernie Fellay's Neo-SSPX and returning to the traditional Catholic principles of Archbishop Marcel Lefebvre, Bishop Richard Williamson, formerly the senior Bishop of the SSPX before it was reorganized by Bernie Fellay to become a puppet of the New Order sect, at that time headed by Benedict-Ratzinger and now by Francis-Bergoglio, had designated Fr. Jean Michel Faure as Coordinator.
In mid January 2014 the TRADITIO Network reported that the Society of St. Pius X's former senior bishop, Richard Williamson, who went independent of that organization in October 2012 to work with traditional Catholics opposed to the Neo-SSPX Superior-Dictator Bernie Fellay's New Order sellout policy, was going to consecrate another bishop for the worldwide traditional Catholic movement.
According to the TRADITIO Network's report at that time, Bishop Williamson's candidate was Fr. Jean-Michel Faure, now 73, who in 2013 also left Bernie Fellay's Neo-SSPX to join The Resistance opposition to Fellay. Both men had been directors of the SSPX's seminary in La Reja, Argentina. Faure had also been the SSPX District Superior of South America. Fr. Faure was one of the first priests in the SSPX. He founded the Latin American apostolate of the SSPX and the La Reja seminary. Archbishop Lefebvre, who founded the traditional Catholic SSPX in 1970 to oppose the takeover of the Church by the unCatholic New Order, was reported to have regarded Fr. Faure highly and to have selected him for consecration in 1988, but Faure at that time declined consecration.
On January 29, 2013, two months before the Second Paedophile Newpope, Benedict-Ratzinger, abdicated in disgrace, the traditional Benedictine Monastery of the Holy Cross in Novo Friburgo, Brazil, issued a Declaration of separation from Fellay and his Neo-SSPX. The Declaration, entitled Ut fideles inveniamur [That we should be found faithful], signed not only by leaders of the Monastery, but by other priests and the SSPX's former senior bishop, Richard Williamson, who associated themselves with the separation from Fellay's Neo-SSPX, included the following points:
The traditional Benedictine Monastery of the Holy Cross was formerly affiliated with Bernie Fellay's former Neo-SSPX institutes that abandoned the Neo-SSPX and Fellay when Fellay made overtures to join the Newchurch of the New Order. It remains to be seen how Francis "Mr. Anti-traditionalist" Bergoglio will respond. Bergoglio is known to hate traditional Catholics and has made several public statements to this effect.
The world is holding vigil to see whether Francis-Bergoglio is a liar or will abdicate in disgrace like his predecessor. The international press is abuzz ever since Francis-Bergoglio was exposed as having appointed as the Newbishop of Osorno, Chile, Juan Barros Madrid. One child victim told the Associated Press how, as a child, he and another boy were sodomized by the Chile's most notorious presbyter while Francis-Bergoglio's appointee Barros watched as a voyeur. "Barros was there, and he saw it all," said the victim.
What is even more scandalous is that Francis-Bergoglio can't plead ignorance on this one. Bergoglio personally knew all about these crimes. He was Newarchbishop in adjoining Argentina. Moreover, a Newvatican investigation in 2011 found the notorious presbyter guilty and sentenced him to a cloistered life of "penitence and prayer." The presbyter actually got off lightly. Under Old Testament justice, he should have been sentenced to castration! The presbyter was brought before a Chilean criminal court as well, but the judge dismissed the charges in 2011 because the statute of limitations had expired. However, the judge ruled that, based on her interviews of the child victims, aged 14 to 17, during her yearlong investigation, she determined that their accusations were truthful and dated to the beginning of the the Modernist Vatican II Council (1962).
Thank God, Bergoglio is not getting away with lies and immoral cover-ups this time. The usually sycophantic international press is holding Bergoglio, who declared a "zero-tolerance policy" on paedophilia by his Newclergy, personally responsible for the most disgusting hypocrisy. Other child victims who have been sexually assaulted by Newclergy have joined in an unprecedented outcry. Bergoglio's appointed, Barros, and even Beroglio himself, have have been pilloried in the international press. Barros has denied complicity, although three witnesses have now sworn that he enjoyed watching while the presbyter, his "superior and mentor," the children were sodomized.
A second child victim said that Bergoglio's Newbishop appointee, Barros, had sex with the presbyter in his presence. The victim reported this fact in a letter to the Newpapal nuncio in Chile at the time and to Bergoglio and the in January 2015. A third child victim said that Barros enjoyed watching the presbyter commit the sodomy. "I saw how Barros watched it all," he said.
Joining in denouncing Barrow and Bergoglio were some 30 current presbyters from the Newdiocese and 51 of Chile's 120 members of Parliament. A month ago they sent a letter to Bergoglio demanding that Barros's appointment be rescinded, but the "zero-tolerance" hypocrite of a Newpope has simply twiddled his thumbs. Barros is still scheduled to be Novus Ordo "installed" Newbishop on March 21, 2015. Francis "Mr. Zero Tolerance" Bergoglio himself has remained mute now for over a month about the crimes against children (and adults) by his Newbishop appointee Barros. Bergoglio's Nuncio to Chile recently published a letter urging Newparishioners to welcome pervert Barros and "prepare, by way of prayer and good works, for the beginning of his pastoral governance." Meanwhile, Barros has gone into hiding.
A victim-advocates group castigated Bergoglio's hypocrisy, saying that he "should have suspended and investigated Barros, not given him another [New]diocese to run." Also implicated is Chile's Newcardinal Francisco Javier Errazuriz, who ignored the eyewitnesses reports. For facilitating the cover-up, Bergoglio rewarded Errazuriz with an appointment of his own -- to Bergoglio's Newpapal Executive Committee of nine Newcardinals, who administer Newchurch in the name of Bergoglio, who himself doesn't want to get his hands dirty with the "details" of day-to-day administration. In another revealing "coincidence," Barros was the Newcardinal's private secretary, who witnesses said was observed destroying evidence of the crimes. The plot thickens. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Associated Press.]
True Catholics, whether Francis-Bergoglio is actually a pope or not can perhaps be debated, but what cannot be debated is that he is a pervert and a hypocrite worse that those in the Hebrew church whom Our Lord described as criminals who "outwardly appear to men beautiful but within are full of dead men's bones and of all filthiness..., full of hypocrisy and iniquity" (Matthew 23:28/DRV). Deo volente, there will soon be two ex-Newpopes rotting away on the bench in the Vatican Gardens, forced to abdicate because of their crimes, frauds, and perjuries -- and face Christ the Judge, Whose vicar they presumed to be.
The "In the Spirit of Chartres" Committee (ISOC) is an example what a small group of traditional Catholic laypeople, completely independent of Newchurch, Neo-SSPX, and other such sellout organizations, can accomplish to restore the traditional Catholic Faith. If traditional Catholic laypeople had done this in the 1960s, there would be no Newchurch of the New Order today, no invalid "New Order" Mess of 1962, not even a phony Half New Order Vatican II "Extraordinary" Mess.
After taking a trip to Chartres Cathedral in 1998, one of the traditional Catholic architectural wonders of all time, Judith Sharpe and her companions, members of Fr. Francis LeBlanc's independent traditional Catholic Our Lady of the Sun International Shrine in El Mirage, outside of Sun City, Arizona, rolled up their sleeves and got to work. ISOC did the Satanists one better: it conducted a Traditional Latin Mass (the real one, not the Vatican II "Extraordinary Mess") in a downtown Phoenix park. It publicly and uncompromisingly demonstrated that true Catholics had no connection to the New Order sect. To supplement its annual public Traditional Latin Mass, it took on the important educational function of teaching traditional Catholics about Tradition, primarily through audio and video resources.
ISOC introduced what is one of the most important religious documentaries of the past 25 years concerning the attempted destruction of the true Catholic Church: "What We Have Lost ... and the Road to Restoration." Since that time, the TRADITIO Fathers have highly recommended this DVD as the single best resource on the subject in video form. For further information, click on FAQ05: What Traditional Catholic Resources Do You Recommend?
"What We Have Lost .. and the Road to Restoration" is must viewing for every traditional Catholic. The documentary examines the attempted destruction of Christ’s One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. It documents what has been lost, but, more importantly, how to get it back. The DVD notes the important role that the Official Traditional Catholic Directory has played since 1994 in bringing fallen-away Catholics and Newchurchers back to the true Mass and Sacraments. Traditional Catholics who have not obtained their copy of this Directory should do so now. For further information, click on the TRADITIO Network's Official Traditional Catholic Directory department.
On the second anniversary of his election as Newpope on March 13, 2013, Francis-Bergoglio indicated this regime would be brief, "four or five years, even two or three. Two have already passed." Bergoglio, age 78, also pointed to short terms for future Newpopes, after the example of Benedict-Ratzinger, who abdicated in disgrace before his eighth year, at age 78. Ratzinger "should not be considered an exception, but an institution," said Bergoglio.
Bergoglio, when asked whether he liked being Newpope, replied: "I don't not like it." He has said the same before. One wonders why he accepted election in the first place; he could have rejected it. His rejection would have spared Newchurch an astonishing amount of corruption, hypocrisy, fraud, embezzlement, and paedophilia. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Reuters.]
True Catholics, there is no Catholic teaching that God selects popes. This is entirely a matter of man. Vatican I documents stated that forty popes were heretics. Many popes were corrupt and immoral. Many popes were unqualified and even stupid. Francis-Bergoglio, the Third Paedophile Newpope, has been one of the worst. God grant Bergoglio his wish for a short regime!
The Greeks taught that in the moral sphere, everything is a matter of antipolon, of balance. This classical philosophical teaching was completely adopted by the Church Principal Theologian, St. Thomas Aquinas, who developed the classical idea of the Aurea Mediocritas, the Golden Mean in the area of Catholic moral theology. Sin can be either of excess or of deficit. For example, the virtue of generosity is the mean between the sinful excess of spendthriftiness and the sinful deficit of stinginess.
Just so, God balances justice and mercy. Too much "blind justice," and individual cases are not prudently judged. Too much false mercy, and sin is encouraged. Grave moral evils are created when one side of the balance is overemphasized, and the other side is ignored. That is exactly what Francis-Bergoglio and Newchurch have been doing. As a result, they have encouraged what Catholic theology calls graviora delicta, the graver sins, among them: sodomy, harming children, and lying and fraud "for the good of the Church." Notice that Bergoglio never talks about God's justice. Bergoglio is way out of Catholic balance.
The notion to exalt a false "mercy" above justice in order to downplay sin was a stratagem of the condemned philosophy of Modernism and its progeny, the Modernist Vatican II Council (1962-1965). Now Bergoglio, himself the progeny of condemned Modernism, has declared a special "Year of Mercy," to commence December 8, 2015, and to end November 20, 2016, a date which the New Order -- but not the Catholic Church -- recognizes as the Feast of Christ the King, wrenched by the New Order sect from the last day of October so as not to contest Protestant Reformation Day, even though Pope Pius XI specifically instituted the Feast on that day to contest the Protestant heresy. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Catholic World News.]
At the center of the New Order sect's rejection of Catholic moral doctrine is the institution of a false "Divine Mercy" cult, initiated around a caricature of a Polish nun, one Sister Faustina, whose diary was placed on the Index Librorum Prohibitorum [Index of Forbidden Books] in 1936. This decision was upheld by Pope John XXIII before Vatican II, on November 28, 1958. Moreover, after Pope John XXIII's suppression of the cult, deliberate mistranslations began to be circulated that "oecumenized" Faustina's original diary. For example, her confirmation of the Catholic doctrine that Jews need to convert to Christianity was eliminated. Prophecies warning of a New Order were expunged. Faustina's quotation of Our Lord's words condemning "pagans, heretics, and schismatics" was omitted from the "sanitized" Modernist-fabricated cult.
This heretically-tainted cult, condemned by Popes Pius XI and John XXIII, was scandalously entered on the Novus Ordo liturgical calendar by the "Unsaint" Polish Newpope to replace the high feast day of the Octave of Easter. The "Feast of Divine Mercy" is strictly Novus Ordo and has no basis in the bimillennial Catholic liturgy. For further information, click on FAQ11: How Do You Explain These Traditional Catholic Practices? in the section "Divine Mercy."
Francis-Bergoglio has long has been viewed with suspicion by Newchurch pseudo-traditionalists, who cling to the Half New Order Vatican II "Mess of 1962+," while true traditional Catholics, who celebrate the Traditional Latin Mass, long ago gave up on the Newchurch Newpopes -- and for good reason. Bergoglio has now denounced the Newchurch pseudo-traditionalists' affectation for the "Extraordinary" Latin Mass as an obsolete "fashion": "It is just necessary to show some patience and kindness to people who are addicted to a certain fashion. But I consider it greatly important to go deeply into things, because if we do not go deeply, no liturgical form, this or that one, can save us." Certainly New Order Mess, which is invalid and offers no grace to anyone, can save anyone.
What the Newpopes have done is to make their Newchurch of the New Order into just another heretical Anglican sect. That heretical sect has long been afflicted with a polarization in worship, in which some "high church" parishes feature elaborate ceremony, while "low church" congregations favor a stripped-down, "modernized" rite. Similarly, low Newchurchers now speak of "presiders" and "eucharists," whereas "extrordinarian" Newchurchers speak of "priests" and "Holy Mass." However, the rub is that both "low" and "extraordinarian" Newchurch is entirely bereft of priests and Holy Mass.
On March 7, 2015, Bergoglio emphasized his dismissal of "Latin Mass" traditionalists. On that date he simulated an invalid Novus Ordo Mess at the church where Paul VI-Montini exactly 50 years before had simulated the Novus Ordo Mess in vulgar Italian for the first time. On leaving the church, Bergoglio said: "Let us give thanks to the Lord for what he has done in his church in these 50 years of liturgical reform. It was really a courageous move by the church to get closer to the people of God so that they could understand well what it does, and this is important for us: to follow Mass [sic] like this."
Bergoglio's statement runs counter to the dogmatic pronouncement of the Council of Trent that Holy Mass is the re-renewal of Christ’s death on the Cross and that Holy Mass is the action of the priest rather than of the congregation. Newchurch, of course, has neither ordained priests nor a valid Mass, but unordained presbyters and an invalid and graceless "communal meal." [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Los Angeles Times.]
True Catholics, Francis-Bergoglio has made destruction of Catholicism and of the valid Catholic Mass one of his principal policies. Just as we TRADITIO Fathers predicted in 2007, the rug has now been pulled out from under the Newchurch pseudo-traditionalists, who foolishly thought that the erroneously-termed "Extraordinary Mess," i.e., the Half New Order Vatican II "Mess of 1962+," would save them. Their foolishness has now made them subject to a Newpope who is taking even that pseudo-Latin Mess away from them. Long ago they, if they had been true Catholics, should have known better and abandoned the anti-Catholic sect of the New Order and its Newpopes.
King Louis IX of France's actions were inspired by Catholic values. He punished blasphemy, gambling, interest-bearing loans, and prostitution, and bought to France relics of Christ, for which he built the Sainte-Chapelle. As a true and enlightened Christian, he banned trials by ordeal, tried to prevent private wars that were plaguing the country, and introduced the presumption of innocence in criminal procedure. After his miraculous healing from a serious illness, St. Louis led against the infidel Mohammedans the Seventh (1248-1254) and Eighth Holy Crusades (1270), in which latter Crusade he died. King Louis IX is the only canonized king of France.
Newchurch will not tell you how this Catholic King and Saint dealt with what then was called heretical "syncretism," and now, since the Modernist Vatican II Council (1962-1965), called "oecumenism," the mixing of false religions with the true Faith. Such heresy was certainly not the lovey-dovey, anti-Christian false oecumenical shivaree the the post-Vatican II Newpopes have tried to foist off on the clueless Newchurchers. Here is the real historical account:
King Louis spoke to me of a great assembly of clergy and Jews that had taken place at the monastery at Cluny. There was a poor knight there at the time to whom the abbot had often given bread for the love of God This knight asked the abbot whether he could speak first, and his request was granted, though somewhat grudgingly. So he rose to his feet and, leaning on his crutch, asked to have the most important and most learned rabbi among the Jews brought before him. As soon as the Jew had come, the knight asked him a question, "May I know, sir," he said, "if you believe that the Virgin Mary, who bore our Lord in her body and cradled Him in her arms, was a virgin at the time of His birth, and is in truth the Mother of God?"
The Jew replied that he had no belief in any of those things. Thereupon the knight told the Jew that he had acted like a fool when -- neither believing in the Virgin nor loving her -- he had set foot in that monastery which was her house. "And by heaven," exclaimed the knight, "I'll make you pay for it!" So he lifted his crutch and struck the Jew such a blow with it near the ear that he knocked him down. Then all the Jews took to flight and carried their sorely-wounded rabbi away with then. Thus the conference ended.
The abbot went up to the knight and told him he had acted most unwisely. The knight retorted that the abbot had been guilty of even greater folly in calling people together for such a conference, because there were many good Christians there who, before the discussion ended, would have gone away with doubts about their own religion through not fully understanding the Jews. "So I tell you," said the king [St. Louis IX], "that no one, unless he is an expert theologian, should venture to argue with these people. But a layman, whenever he hears the Christian religion abused, should not attempt to defend its tenets, except with his sword, and that he should thrust into the scoundrel's belly, and as far as it will enter." [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Rothwell's English Historical Documents.]
True Catholics, the heretical notion of "oecumenism," introduced by Vatican II, is anti-Catholic and anti-Christian. It has lead, just as St. Louis predicted, to common belief among Newchurchers, and others, that "All Gods Are Equal" and "We All Worship the Same God." It is only when we blot out all the anti-Catholic post Vatican II propaganda of the Newpopes that we see what true Catholicism should be -- just as St. Louis IX taught.
It seems that Francis-Bergoglio has some inkling what poor excuse of a Newpope he is. In a March 10, 2015, interview, he admitted that if he is assassinated, he doesn't want it to hurt because he is "a real wimp." This from a man who supposedly took an oath to shed his blood for the true Faith, no matter how painful. One can only think of the great St. Lawrence of Rome, who was martyred on a spit as he was being burned to death by the Roman authorities. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by La Carcova of Buenos Aires.]
True Catholics, all the arguments about sede-vacantism become moot when you consider that even Francis-Bergoglio doesn't seem to consider himself a true pope. And this is not the first time in the last two years of his regime that he has offered that explanation for why he has strayed so far from the Catholic Faith.
The poor pseudo-traditionalists, those who sold out to the Newchurch of the New Order as long as they could get their Half New Order Vatican II "Mess of 1962+," erroneously known as the "Extraordinary" Mess. Their champion was the disgraced Benedict-Ratzinger, now under house arrest by Francis-Bergoglio in the Vatican Gardens. Bergoglio has made it clear that he hates the "Extraordinary" Mess and, little by little, has dismantled it.
On November 24, 2014, Francis-Bergoglio appointed Newcardinal Robert Sarah as head of what Newchurch calls "Divine Worship and the Discipline of the Sacraments." On March 9, 2015, Sarah spoke out and ordered Newchurch pseudo-traditionalists to stop conducting a "liturgical war" against the (invalid) Novus Ordo Mess, which Benedict-Ratzinger declared the "Ordinary Mess" of Newchurch. Sarah said that he backed Francis-Bergoglio, who has spoken out against the "Extraordinary" Mess as "doctrinaire, idealogue, rigid, ritualistic, rigorous, (heretical) Pelagian, (heretical) Donatist." [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Catholic News Agency.]
True Catholics, Francis-Bergoglio has been consistently replacing head of Congregations with Newcardinals after his own stripe: anti-Catholic, anti-traditionalist, even pro-paedophile. Now Sarah's cat is out of the bag, and the clueless "Extraordinarians," who sold out to Benedict-Ratzinger's phony "Latin Mess" that is not the Traditional Latin Mass, should long off have jumped overboard from Bergoglio's sinking Newroman barque.
In addition to his recently-exposed fraud in concealing one-third of Newchurch's wealth off the account books, Francis-Bergoglio's and his precedessor Newpopes' role as custodian of Newchurch's goods is now kaput. The culture of cover-up is so pervasive in the Newchurch of the New Order, that lying, cheating, and stealing has been out of control for the last fifty years since the Modernist Vatican II Council (1962-1965). Only now is the world beginning to understand just how corrupt Newchurch and its Newpopes have been, including Francis-Bergoglio. The latest Newvatican scandal that just broke onto the pages of the international press started with the "Unsaint" JPII-Wojtyla and was perpetuated under the unholy regime of Francis-Bergoglio.
Newvatican is the repository of priceless historical documents, which the popes are sworn to guard, protect, and preserve. It is now clear that, in addition to all their other grave faults, the Newpopes have been playing fast and loose with the artifacts of Western Civilization. Bergoglio didn't fess up until a ransom note came to the attention of the international press demanding over 100,000 U.S. dollars for the return of two rare documents personally signed by Renaissance master Michelangelo and supposedly kept in the Vatican Archives.
Although the documents were stolen from Newvatican 20 years ago, the "Unsaint" JPII-Wojtyla, the disgraced Benedict-Ratzinger, and the Marxist Francis-Bergoglio never admitted it, until a ransom note became public on March 8, 2015. Then Bergoglio couldn't deny it. The international press reports that the thief was an Newvatican employee. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the U.K. Telegraph.
True Catholics, the Newpopes installed after Vatican II are incompetent fraudsters. Francis-Bergoglio claims that he wants to be transparent, but he waited over two years to admit that the Michelangelo documents had been stolen, and then only when the international press forced him to tell the truth. How's that for "transparency"? Bergoglio is a fraudster, that, in addition to being anti-Catholic, is an incompetent administrator, who should suffer the ancient papal penalty of being thrown into Rome's Tiber River like so much refuse. The early Church certainly knew how to get rid of errant popes!
Once again showing that he is not a Catholic, Francis-Bergoglio gave his full support to the heretical "Neocatechumenal Way" on March 6, 2015, also a favorite of the "Unsaint" JPII-Wojtyla. The so-called "Neocatechumenal Way" is a subset of the "Charismatic" heresy, which takes its origin in the Protestant heresy. The Neo-Catechumenal Way denies many Catholic doctrines:
The roots of modern-day Charismaticism (Pentecostalism) go back to 1901 when a group of Methodists at a Topeka, Kansas, prayer meeting began "experiencing the spirit." A typical charismatic prayer meeting includes music, singing or praying in tongues, healing sessions, prophesying, and body prayer. In Newchurch the movement is associated with such cult-like, mind-controlling organizations and programmes as the Confraternity of Christian Doctrine (CCD, which was perfectly traditional before Vatican II), Taize, false "oecumenism," Marriage Encounter, the Rite of Christian Initiation for Adults (RCIA), Renew, Focolare, Cursillo, Neo-Catechumenal Way, Legionnaires of Christ/Regnum Christi, Communion and Liberation, Miles Jesu, Wicca (Gaia), and Life Teen. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Catholic News Service.]
For further information, click on FAQ10: How Do You Explain These Traditional Catholic Beliefs? in the section "Charismatic Movement."
True Catholics, once again Francis-Bergoglio shows himself to be in league with the worst anti-Catholic elements. It isn't enough that he wants to limit families and have parents slap their children around. It isn't enough that he hides billions of dollars off Newvatican's books and hypocritically calls himself "Mr. Poverty." Now he is a public supporter of the craziest "Charistmatic" Protestant sects, which even Billy Graham would consider ridiculous and un-Christian!
Proving once again the TRADITIO Network's contention that Newchurch's Great Sex & Embezzlement Holocaust continues unabated under Francis-Bergoglio, a new paedophile scandal has erupted in which Bergoglio is the central figure. And now "Mr. Popularity" Bergoglio is being slammed by thousands of his own Newchurchers for his personal complicity in appointing a paedophile-facilitator as Newbishop.
It seems that local Newchurchers have had a belly-full of "Mr. Popularity" Bergoglio and his paedophile propaganda. On March 6, 2015, Bergoglio met with the temporary administrator of the Newchurch diocese of Osorno, Chile, about Bergoglio's appointment of Juan Barros Madrid as permanent Newbishop, a many who had covered up Chile's most notorious paedophile Newchurch presbyter. Bergoglio wouldn't comment on the secret meeting, but it is well known that Bergoglio is being beaten up by Chileans for attempting to appoint the paedophiliac Newbishop.
Bergoglio appointed Barros in January 2015, but he hasn't been installed yet. Already 1,300 laypeople, 51 of Chile's 120 national lawmakers, and many of the 35 presbyters from the Newdiocese have demanded that Bergoglio rescind his outrageous appointment. Bergoglio can hardly plead ignorance: Newvatican itself disciplined him in 2011 for "sexually abusing minors," usually a euphemism for rape and sodomy. A civil judge in Chile also found the charges against the presbyter to be truthful, but the paedophile presbyter was let off because the statute of limitations had expired.
The child victims publicly accused Bergoglio's Newbishop appointee, Barros, of being "close" to the paedophile presbyter and of seeking to get him off. In this incident, Bergoglio is exposed as in fact the paedophile-facilitator that his propaganda tries falsely to deny. He has until the March 21, 2015, installation ceremony to pull his outrageous appointment. Bergoglio claims to have a zero-tolerance policy toward his paedophile Newchurch clergy, yet here he has knowingly appointed one of the worst to a high position in his Newpapal regime. Bergoglio has never publicly disciplined a single one of his Newbishops, several of whom have been implicated in crimes against children. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Associated Press.]
True Catholics, in the last several weeks Francis-Bergoglio has been implicated in "cooked" books, which undervalued his Newpapacy's wealth by a full one-third. Yet Bergoglio claimed that he was going to clean up Benedict-Ratzinger's financial scandals. Bergoglio has now been implicated in knowingly facilitating a notorious paedophile presbyter by appointing him a Newbishop. Yet Bergoglio claims that he has a zero-tolerance policy. The record after two years of his regime is clear beyond denial: the man is a liar who has, by his patently false propaganda, succeeded in winning a popularity contest with his clueless Newchurchers. Now, however, "Mr. Popularity" seems headed for a precipitous fall.
Do you remember that when Benedict-Ratzinger was barred by the Prime Minister of Ireland from entering that country as a result of his Newchurch paedophilia holocaust in that country, Ratzinger absconded, with his tail between his legs, to Malta, which was supposed to be conservatively Newchurch? Now the TRADITIO Network's Malta correspondent has sent us pictures to show just how New Order Malta has become!
In August 2014 Ratzinger's disgusting "Ordinary" Mess was performed in the town of Attard, Malta. The Newchurch pseudo-traditionalists revel in Ratzinger's half New Order Vatican II so-called "Extraordinary" Mess, but they conceal the fact that Ratzinger simultaneously declared as the "Ordinary" Mess of Newchurch the invalid New Order Mess, in all its sacrilegious and abominable forms.
The picture above speaks a thousands words to show how corrupt Newchurch has become and what a fraud Ratziner, no "traditionalist," was. This "youth" Mess was performed by an unordained presbyter on a Novus Ordo "dinner table" that is so low that he has to kneel to do his invalid performance. On the "dinner table" are prohibited paraffin votive candles. The true Mass, in accordance with Tradition going back to Apostolic times, and even before, requires beeswax candles in candlesticks on a true altar. In front of the "dinner table" at the "Low Altar" Mess are depicted cartoon characters. For further information, click on the TRADITIO Network's Novus Ordo Service Gallery department.
True Catholics, Newchurch is a fraud. Benedict-Ratzinger is just as much a fraud as is his successor as Newpope, Francis-Bergoglio. If you consider yourself a Catholic, you can have nothing to do with either of these men, nor with the invalid Protestant/Freemasonic New Mess of 1969. If you do, you are an anti-Catholic heretic, denounced by the Catholic Saints. It's as simple as that.
You've heard all those inflated claims of the number of "Catholics" in countries around the world. Of course, we know that these people are not Catholics at all, but members of Newchurch. But that aside, now the fraud that Newchurch uses to fabricate its phony numbers have been exposed by -- of all people -- an atheist, but at least an atheist who is honest. It's pretty sad when it is the atheist who is honest, and the Newpope who is dishonest.
A fraud that, in one form or another, Francis-Bergoglio's Newchurch is perpetrating around the world to inflate its membership numbers for secular political purposes has been exposed by a French atheist. Thomas Bores was originally baptized a Newchurcher and recently moved to Berlin. He has now gone public with his outrage that the German government has classified him as a "Catholic" for tax purposes. When he moved to Berlin in 2013, he stated his religion was "no religion" or "atheist" on official documents.
Yet the Newchurch archdiocese of Berlin checked up on him. It asked a French Newdiocese to nose into his private records for a baptismal certificate. The Newarchdiocese then reported that Bores was a "Catholic" and claimed a mandatory 10 per cent surcharge from Bores’s payroll taxes! Others have reported similar experiences, but Francis-Bergoglio's fraudulent Newchurch, of course, denies any wrongdoing. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Agence France-Presse.]
True Catholics, Francis-Bergoglio's Newchurch is nothing if not greedy for any ill-gotten euro it can lay its hands on, at the same time claiming some kind of pseudo-Franciscan "poverty." Moreover, it lays claim to a much greater secular political clout than it in fact has by inflating its membership numbers to an obscene level. But it's all par for the course in Newchurch, which is infested with fraud, corruption, embezzlement, and paedophilia, paedophilia-complicity by its Newpope leaders on down.
Dear TRADITIO Fathers:
The Newchurch pseudo-traditionalists keep calling the Mess of 1962+ the Traditional Latin Mass, but that's not right, is it? Isn't the 1962 Mess, falsely now called the "Extraordinary," really just a corrupted knockoff of the Traditional Latin Mass?
The TRADITIO Fathers Reply.
Yes, the "Mess of 1962+" is a corrupted Mess, deviating in major ways from the Traditional Latin Mass, as it existed in 1950 and before. After 1950, the Freemason presbyter Hannibal Bugnini got hold of it, and changed it into a Protestantized service. By 1962, the year the Modernist Vatican II Council began, he had gotten half way to the invalid New Order Mess. In 1969, he had gotten all the way. By that time, and at least two years before, Newchurch had an invalid Protestantized service. For further information, click on the TRADITIO Network's Traditional Latin Mass, Divine Office & Sacraments department, in the section "The Descent into the Black Hole of the Liturgical 'New Order.'"
It is sometimes fraudulently maintained by the Newchurch pseudo-traditionalists that the 1962 Mess hardly differs from the Traditional Latin Mass. Such a contention is ridiculous. Between 1951 and 1962, there were some 350 pages' worth of deviations from the Traditional Latin Mass, including, among may other corruptions:
Certainly anyone who claims to be "traditional" and accepts the corrupted "Mess of 1962+" is deceiving himself. There is no doubt that, in the historical context, it was used as a fraudulent stepping-stone to the full-blown invalid Novus Ordo Mess of 1969.
In 2012 the Society of St. Pius X's senior bishop, Richard Williamson, closest to Archbishop Lefebvre, abandoned Bernie Fellay and his new organization, the Neo-SSPX. Fellay is the NSSPX Superior-General, who had turned his back on Archbishop Lefebvre's traditional Catholic principles and had attempted a sellout of the SSPX to the New Order sect headed by the Second Paedophile Newpope, Benedict-Ratzinger, who on February 28, 2013, abdicated in disgrace.
Since 2012, Bishop Williamson has been the only one of the four original SSPX bishops who has had the courage to call out Fellay for the traitor to traditional Catholicism that he is. On January 1, 2015, however, that situation changed. Williamson reports in his February 28, 2015, bulletin that bishop Tissier de Mallerais, in a speech in Chicago, Illinois, on that date, joined Williamson in denouncing Fellay's principle of selling out to the anti-Catholic New Order sect. Although Tissier has written the most comprehensive biography of the Archbishop, he had, up to 2015, remained timid, turning a blind eye to how Fellay has "for many years been slowly, but surely betraying the Archbishop's fight for the Faith."
All that changed, however, on January 1, 2015, when Bishop Tissier gave his anti-Fellay speech, publicly underscoring the principle: "It is, therefore, a strict duty for every priest wanting to remain Catholic to separate himself from the Conciliar Church [the Newchurch of the New Order] for as long it does not rediscover the Tradition of the Church and of the Catholic Faith." Tissier went on to warn against "false friends" in Fellay's Neo-SSPX who do not want to remain separated from the Conciliar Church, to use the Archbishop's term for the New Order sect, the anti-Catholic sect now headed by Francis-Bergoglio. What Tissier proclaimed in his New Year 2015 speech reportedly threw Bernie Fellay into a rage. As a result, Tissier's head may be the next on Fellay's chopping block.
True Catholics, Fellay's attempt to change Archbishop Lefebvre's original SSPX traditional Catholic organization into the Neo-SSPX fraud, because Fellay aches to become part of the anti-Catholic New Order sect now headed by Francis-Bergoglio, continues to fall apart. Tissier should do true Catholics a favor by remaining faithful to the consecration oath he took and formally abandon Fellay. In that case, the last remaining SSPX bishop, Alfonso de Galarreta, would be certain to follow, and Fellay would be left all alone, abandoned and despised, to sell out to the "Marxist" Newpope, Francis-Bergoglio.
A San Antonio, Texas, Newchurch-installed presbyter has announced that he will be first to begin accepting "confessions" over a social media "chat" site from March 2-16, 2015. The presbyter, who claims to have been a presbyter for 23 years, has not identified himself. The Newchurch archdiocese of San Antonio issued a reply that could be characterized as both lukewarm and misleading. A "lay deacon" named Pat Rodgers said that "confessions must be done face-to-face, and a digital confession goes against the Church's teachings." That is correct in so far as it goes, but it doesn't go at all far enough.
Confessions by any other method than direct, in-person communication, are flat out invalid. Moreover, such "confessions," being invalid, are not covered by the seal of secrecy. But even that is barely whole truth. In fact, there is no Sacrament of Penance in Newchurch. It was replaced by the Newchurch of the New Order in 1973 with a "rite of reconciliation," which is not sacramental and is not valid; therefore, its contents can be revealed, as there is no valid "seal" of secrecy (sigillum). Moreover, by 1973, the Newchurch of the New Order had jettisoned the Catholic priesthood, when, in 1968, it replaced the Sacrament of Holy Orders with a Protestantized New Ordinal, which merely "installed" presbyters "to preside over the assembly of the people." Thus, Newchurch presbyters are not ordained "to forgive sin," as are traditionally-ordained priests outside of Newchurch. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Fox News.]
True Catholics, anyone who goes to phony "confession" in Newchurch is not only committing the Mortal Sin of Sacrilege, but is moreover subjecting himself to a double whammy: no valid absolution and no secrecy!
Newcardinal George Pell, who used to be the darling of the Newchurch pseudo-traditionalists because of a few conservative mumblings, is sinking fast. Francis-Bergoglio's appointee as Economic Czar, Pell, was supposed to clean out the muck of Newvatican's financial stalls. Actually, Pell has turned out to be far worse than his predecessors.
At the College of Newcardinals' meeting at Newrome in February 2015, Pell announced that 1,500,000,000 had been "discovered" in secret Newvatican accounts, an amount that is a full one-third of Newvatican's entire budget. Then he told the Newcardinals that whatever other programmes Bergoglio might cut, they need not worry: the Newcardinals' Retirement Fund was fully funded. Their palaces and their Novus Ordo nun-servants escaped unscathed from financial scrutiny.
Now it turns out that Francis-Bergoglio's appointee is the "Newcardinal of Bling," exceeding the extravagance of the Newbishop of Limburg, Germany, who at least spend his Newdiocese's money on church buildings. The Italian Weekly L'Espresso reported in its February 27, 2015, edition that Pell in just six months had run up a tab of 575,000,000 U.S. dollars, virtually stealing the contributions of Newchurchers, who cluelessly think that their donations to the Bergoglio's collection plate are going to charitable works. Pell is scrutinizing others' expenditures, but when it comes to his own, he is home free! Like that 3,000-dollar clergy suit (must be made of gold thread). [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Associated Press.]
True Catholics, (old) Rome's greatest satirical poet well asked: "Quis custodiet custodes ipsos?" While Pell is riding roughshod over everyone else's expense accounts, his own goes unmonitored. And who was it who appointed this hypocrite? Why, the greatest hypocrite of all: Francis-Bergoglio. Bergoglio knew full well that he was appointing corruption in the person of George Pell. After all, Pell didn't get his nickname "Paedo Pell," acquired in Newchurch's Sex & Embezzlement Holocaust in Australia, for nothing!
Francis-Bergoglio's agents are being accused of theft of mail. It seems that 120 books defending Catholic teaching on marriage sent to Newbishops selected to participate in the October 2014 "Extraordinary Synod on the Family " were intercepted and purloined. Although the charge was serious enough for Bergoglio's mouthpiece, Federico Lombardi, to deny, at a press conference on February 27, 2015, the criminal action, the publisher of the book maintained that the copies sent had been stolen by Bergoglio's agents before being put in the Newbishops' mailboxes.
The book strongly argued against Bergoglio's anti-Catholic theology that is moving like a tonne of bricks to let divorced and remarried individuals -- condemned in the Bible by Our Lord Jesus Christ Himself, as reported in three of the Gospels -- munch on the invalid New Order cookies. Bergoglio's intimated teaching overtly contracts Christ's teaching that marriage is indissoluble and that those who remarry, i.e., commit bigamy, are prohibited from the invalid New Order cookie. [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by the Associated Press.]
True Catholics, the fix is in. Francis-Bergoglio's regime will stoop even to criminal theft of mail in order to destroy what little remains of Catholicism in his Newchurch of the New Order. Bergoglio wants the second section of his "Extraordinary Synod" to rubber stamp his plans to destroy even the few remaining vestiges of Catholic marriage.
On February 28, 2015, Ex-pope Benedict-Ratzinger celebrated the second anniversary of his abdication. Kept under close guard in his retirement villa in the Vatican Gardens, Ratzinger has been all but blotted out from memory. In the Francis-Bergoglio regime, he has suffered, in essence, the penalty reserved for errant Roman emperors: damnatio memoriae, the erasure from memory. His souvenirs are almost absent from the stalls in the streets around St. Peter's Archbasilica, replaced by propaganda portraits of a grinning Bergoglio.
The international press still speculates that Ratzinger quit because he was on the verge of a nervous breakdown, unable to cope with the pressure of dealing with a Newchurch consumed with paedophilia even among its top clergy and plagued with financial corruption on thitherto unseen scale. The irony is that Bergoglio is just as corrupt, but he has been able to plaster a smile over the seamy reality. Recently, his Economic Prefect, Newcardinal George Pell, who was spirited away by Bergoglio to Newvatican when the Australian courts were learning of his complicity in paedophilia, announced that Newvatican had "discovered" an extra 1,500,000,000 U.S. dollars, fully one-third of Newchurch's financial assets. Meanwhile, Bergoglio has been fraudulently playing "Mr. Poverty." But, Pell announced, the Newcardinals need not worry: their retirement benefits are fully funded!Ratzinger's own intimate, "butler" Paolo Gabrieli, was so scandalized by his principal's behavior that he turned over confidential documents to the Italian press, showing a Ratzingerian Newpapacy "beset by corruption, nepotism and fierce internal rivalries." [Some information for this Commentary was contributed by Agence France-Presse.]
True Catholics, Ex-Newpope Ratzinger, the "Prisoner of Newvatican," of course continues to deny the reports that there is friction between him and Francis-Bergoglio. He also continues to deny that widespread reports that he had been forced out of the Newpapacy by the College of Newcardinals because of incompetence. If Ratzinger admitted that, Bergoglio would be outed as an Antipope.
Dear TRADITIO Fathers:
You are exactly right in asserting that Francis-Bergoglio's Newchurch of the New Order is proceeding to champion the Arch-heretic Martin Luther as a oecumenical "saint." I myself heard an announcement from a Newchurch pulpit regarding the "upcoming celebration of Martin Luther." What is even more surprising is that this announcement came at a Fraternity of St. Peter (FSSP) church in Virginia, a Newchurch organization that claims to be "traditionalist."
At another FSSP site that I used to go to before embracing truly traditional Catholicism, we were lectured not to feel "better than" the Novus Ordo parishioners because we went to the Half Novus Ordo "Latin Mass of 1962+" -- which, I now understand, is not the Traditional Latin Mass. After being degraded, we FSSPers would, nevertheless, be strong-armed for large amounts of money because the FSSP had imprudently taken out big loans that it was having trouble paying off.
The TRADITIO Fathers Reply.
It is clear that Francis-Bergoglio has begun implementation of the next phase of the New Order. This phase will officially recognize heretics as New Order "saints." Bergoglio has already declared a heretic as a Doctor of Newchurch, and plans to Novus Ordo con-anize the Marxist Newbishop Oscar Romero. Newchurch has already implemented an invalid Protestantized Mess, Protestantized (and worse) Catholic doctrine, and established a new morality exalting sodomy. The con-anization of heretics is the logical next step, and has been under way since 2000, when the "Unsaint" JPII-Wojtyla planted the seed.
Many Newchurchers think that the FSSP is "traditionalist" and uses the "Traditional Latin Mass." Both assertions are false. The service that the FSSP uses is the Half New Order Vatican II "Mess of 1962+," commonly and falsely known as "Extraordinary." The FSSP is an arm of the Newchurch of the New Order and follows its unCatholic bishops. If an FSSP site is not New Order enough, the site is closed down. The FSSP knows this fact, so it doesn't stray from the New Order line in their Messes, sermons (sorry: "homilies"), and practices.
Moreover, the FSSP clerics are not priests, but Novus Ordo presbyters, as their ordaining bishops are have been not consecrated under the valid traditional Sacrament of Holy Orders, but merely "installed" under the invalid Protestantized New Ordinal of 1968. Thus, they have no power to ordain any priest, no matter what form is used.
Return to Daily Commentaries from the TRADITIO Fathers.